The future of the biological field station is not large fancy lab dropped in the middle of a jungle, but rather a network of mobile laboratories distributed throughout an ecosystem.
we are combining Digital Naturalism Laboratories’ previous research in Mobile Makerspaces like the Philippines “BOAT Lab” (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n0L-SNO4A5w) with the decades of experience that the sustainable architecture firm, Cresolus (https://www.cresolus.com/), has experience building in building tropical architecture like homes and field stations in national parks. We are creating modular, mobile laboratories that scientists can bring directly to their field sites around the world.
What is the challenge?
Field biologists and conservationists are faced with a
paradox: The goal of their work is to protect and understand natural
ecosystems, but the mere act of accessing their field sites generally requires
some amount of environmental destruction. Almost all travel for field biology
relies on the burning of fossil fuels, which are destructive not only in the
original drilling, but also in the pollution they give off into the very
environments being studied. Moving vehicles back and forth between field sites
also introduces physical destruction and noise pollution to natural areas which
may negatively impact the work being done to begin with.
Additionally, most conservationists and field biologists are
constrained for time and space by the samples they collect. Researchers need to
get to the sites, collect their samples, and get them back to labs for
processing within a limited time-window. This means that these trips to field
sites are often a constant, daily commute which takes a toll on the environment
(as well as the researcher’s and their projects!).
Like a surgeon cutting through healthy flesh to find a
disease, these researchers will never be able to completely stop causing some
damage to get to the places they study, but we can work to greatly reduce the
Instead of having thousands of researchers around the world
commuting between field sites just to bring samples back to the laboratory, we
think that the whole laboratory should be brought to the field.
These laboratory “Pods” can be towed or floated to field sites deep in forests or up rivers while withstanding inclement weather or hazardous terrain. Advances in sustainable energy harvesting coupled with the miniaturization of technology means that researchers can process their data and samples on-site (even genetic sampling labs can be miniaturized!). Thus field biologists and conservationists can make fewer unnecessary trips back and forth between the field and lab and increase their productivity while minimizing their own footprint in these areas.
We have already tested functional prototypes of these modular labs with many researchers and conservationists around the world including those from the Smithsonian, National Geographic, and many major universities.
Helping field biologists and conservationists destroy less of the environments they are trying to save and understand.
1. The reduction energy of moving
scientists back and forward to labs (your point).
2. The modular lab trailer that can
be used multiple times in different configurations therefore reducing the cost
of dedicated lab space in a building.
3. The trailer is made from reused
car parts (the differential, axel and wheels come from a jeep, the chassis from
a Toyota pickup).
4. Because it is a trailer it
requires very little energy to move (vehicles would be traveling to site
5. It allows studies/research to
continue for greater length of time (often scientists have to travel to a
country multiple times to create their data sets this could help reduce that).
6. Allows scientists to work in
tropical conditions more efficiently (ie it could be bug proof and weather
proof so they don’t have to leave the site so often)
7. Allows scientists to sleep in the field (Can be adapted to provide accommodation so they don’t have to travel back to sleep somewhere)
Both Digital Naturalism Laboratories (Dinalab) and Cresolus are concerned with getting researchers access to incredible ecosystems in sustainable ways. We met while repairing bridges on “Pipeline Road” nature park in Gamboa Panama. Pipeline is one of the most heavily researched areas in the past century, but unfortunately, due to bureaucratic disagreements with the local field station and government entities, many parts of this historic field site have fallen into ruin preventing most visiting scientists and conservationists from conducting their work here. We set up our own volunteer initiative to restore access to these field sites using sustainably sourced and upcycled materials (here’s a time-lapse of one bridge we completely rebuilt
While spending days toiling in the hot jungle, on a volunteer initiative to rebuild bridge and trail infrastructure for a historic research and conversation site (Pipeline Road in Panama), Dinalab and Cresolus got to learn about each other’s work in mobile labs and sustainability design. We also got to hear the laments of the field biologists discussing the paradox of how they do field research because they love nature, but that in order to do it, they currently cause lots of pollution in the form of constantly driving back and forth to bring samples from the field to the lab.
This led us to the inspiration that, maybe instead of
constantly bringing field samples to the lab, maybe we should bring the lab to
No, we are taking Cresolus’s mobile architecture studios they bring to jungles when building parks and outfitting them with scientific tools. These initial tests proved not only functional, but can help increase productivity! Now we just need to design and test more!
In our early research
(https://dl.acm.org/doi/abs/10.1145/3196709.3196748), we established a hierarchy of needs for labs
that starts with
Most people we discuss this challenge with automatically
assume that getting power to a mini-modular field station deep in a remote
field site would be the biggest challenge, but actually with solar power,
pre-charged battery banks, inverters, and sustainable designs (e.g. passive
cooling), getting power to the research equipment will not be our main
Instead the key aspects of the design are creating a modular
system that can facilitate the research of many different types of scientists
and conservationists while keeping the sensitive tools protected, organized,
and easy to work with.
We already have many tested and experimental designs with workstations and lab equipment, for example, that expand from a trailer or pack into modular pelican cases.
Scientists and Conservationists doing remote fieldwork. Tens
of thousands of researchers visit established field stations per year, like the
Smithsonian Tropical Research Institution in Panama, but generally still need
to travel long distances from the field stations to their field sites. Most of
these researchers are forced to spend long days commuting back and forth from
the labs at the field station to their sites in the field, and because of the
time-sensitive nature of the data they are collecting and samples to be processed,
cannot simply stay out for longer durations. Due to the generally treacherous
nature of back-country travel, each additional trip also increases the chance
of physical or mechanical danger to the researchers and their vehicles.
Instead, visiting researchers will be able to rent our labs and bring them directly to their field sites. There, they can stay, conducting their work, with a modular selection of the laboratory tools they need, and make one final trip after their research has been finished.
Scientists will be able to rent our mobile laboratories and
bring them directly to their field sites to conduct and process their work in
nature. The pods are designed and tested for rough-terrain to get to off-road
sites, and can be loaded onto pontoons to function as floating laboratories in
aquatic environments. We also offer services to deliver the pods into the
research sites for the scientists, and pods are made to perfectly fit in
shipping containers to they can be used anywhere around the world.
The environment bears most of the cost currently that we
hope to address. At a time when fuel
costs are absurdly cheap and biology and conservation budgets are small, many
researchers feel forced to carry out their work the traditional ways, meaning
lots of travel back and forth to field sites. The damage caused is not only
from the drilling to extract the fossil fuels, or the pollution strewn across
the target environment, but the constant back-and-forth travel disrupts the
ecosystem and introduces noise-pollution which may impact the studies the
researchers hope to conduct in the first place.
Additionally, many existing laboratories and field stations
are still heavily dependent on fossil-fuels. Our pods, on the other hand, will be
equipped with renewable power sources or pre-charged from our solar arrays.
Mobile labs are not a completely new concept. Many research ships function like this already (famously like Jacques Cousteau’s floating labs), and other designers/researchers have launched similar projects such as Marko Peljan’s “Makrolab,” a modular lab that could fit into shipping containers and shipped around the world.
Other projects we know of include Steven Roberts’s “Nomadic Research Labs”, Marko Peljan’s Makrolab prototype for a mobile art and science workstation, The Hackteria Network’s outdoor DIY art-science workshops, American Arts Incubator’s “Waterspace” Project building a floating art-science makerspace, Jacobs and Zoran’s work with mobile digital craft labs and hunter-gatherer tribes in the Kalahari, and the Signal Fire Arts and Activism Residency that doubles as a backpacking trip.
Unfortunately, many scientists, especially small research groups, or grad students lack the funding needed to invest in such larger infrastructure. Our pods are customized with equipment for the individual researcher or small group and delivered to the field at minimal costs. Cresolus, as an established sustainable architecture firm working in national parks around the world, already has offices and the ability to make and deliver these pods to the field sites already used by many researchers in Central America and Africa.
Moreover, all our designs will be open-source, so researchers
can further add on to the designs we have and contribute to better mobile labs
What are your Team’s primary work tasks and activities
over the next 3-6 months? (optional)
We already have functioning prototypes tested with
scientists in key research areas (Pipeline Road). Our goals for the very next
stage of the project are to do another round of more formalized testing and
evaluation and to develop further features to add to the pods’ designs.
We aim to enroll existing scientist clients such as such as Dr.
Rachel Page’s Bat Lab with the Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute, and Corey
Tarwater’s Avian Ecology lab from the University of Wyoming who both do
extensive field work on Pipeline road. We will provide their researchers with
reduced rate use of the pods.
Modular features that we intend to design into the projects
that we will be working on over the next several months include:
-Expandable Flight Cages
-Dry ice storage / Peltier Coolers
-Expandable work stations
-Built in 360-camera traps / Acoustic monitoring
What are your project needs over the next 3-6 months in
terms of resources, skills and knowledge? (optional)
To complete our next steps, we primarily need a little bit
of funding to carve out some design time between our two organizations to
dedicate to further develop the prototypes we already have.
We already have most of the materials, electronics, field
sites, and evaluators available, we just need time to put these together and
continue testing and sharing these designs.
What are your project goals?
For the very next stage of our project our main goal is to
get one of these pods functional and consistently rented out to different researchers
visiting our field sites over the next year.
Our longer-term goal is that within two years, we will have
three of these pods available at the different field sites Cresolus works in,
such as Gabon, or Belize.
Finally, we hope that within 5 years, we will have had and
documented enough uses of these mobile laboratories that the idea of renting
them out has become commonplace within research communities. We will have many
pods available for conservationists and biologists around the world, and other organizations
will replicate many of the ideas we have shared and tested.
As a raffle prize helping out donations for the local indigenous group and vegetable delivery service, we made some nice cute cookie cutter designs. They are free to download, use, remix, do whatever you want! just sharing love for these nice animals!
The headband just needs -acrylic-laser cutter -Rubber band
-(optional) Eva Foam or Self-Adhesive weather stripping (for forehead comfort)
For the face shield, ideally you have thin sheets of PET that you can laser cut as well, but if you don’t you can use A4 transparency sheets (like we will be) or a sliced up 3 Liter soda bottle (like we also use). The key advantages of this design are
SPEED- Each takes only about 5 minutes to cut, and maybe 8 minutes total to make (compared to 1.5 hours for a 3D print), plus you can nest them to use less material!
USE of LIMITED MATERIALS -The headbands can be cut out of Acrylic, PET, or most other plastic sheets you might have (could possibly use wood and MDF, but might be harder to sanitize)
-Can attach different types of simple or disposable face shields like A4 transparency sheets or 3 Liter soda bottles
There are plenty of other designs out there that may be nicer or fancier or might make sense if you have a fleet of 3D printers instead of a laser cutter. Figure out what works best with the materials you have. Here in Panama most of the stores except grocery stores are shut down, so most of these materials you can find at the Super 99 grocery store (e.g. EVA foam and Plastic sheets or soda bottles)
For the face shield, ideally you have thin sheets of PET that you can laser cut as well, but if you don’t you can use A4 transparency sheets (like we will be) or a sliced up 3Liter soda bottle (like we also use)
A while ago, I crocheted a túngara, a frog I hear a lot during the wet season in Panamá. I wanted to have my model make the distinctive túngara call, which sounds like a video game sound effect, but I didn’t know how. For Christmas, Andrew gave me a bunch of cool electronics that I can record on and embed in soft toys. He even loaded one with a recording of a túngara for me!
We opened the frog up and inserted the device.
Here’s a picture of a real túngara with its characteristic inflated dewlap.
I’m looking forward to making more noisy toys like this! Someone suggested a toucan, which should be fun.
Note: This post is by Kitty and is cross-posted over all my personal blog, wellreadpanda.com 🙂
Rachel Page’s Bat Lab at the Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute has been hosting a monthly outreach “Bat Night” in gamboa Panama, for quite some time. DINALAB figured it was about time they had their own bat signal!
For our open-source 360 camera trap project, we wanted to evaluate the field and figure out what the most available and useful cameras to hack would be. We collected about 6 commercially available camera traps and evaluated them on their
In our qualitative order, here is a ranking of those cameras we have tested and the order we want to hack them:
Object Pixel Density (front)
Object Pixel Density (side)
Sensitivity to infrared
Ricoh Theta V
Ricoh Theta S
Basic Testing Procedure
Object Pixel Density
We took all of the cameras in a room with controlled lighting, and placed a colorful, standard-sized basketball exactly 2 meters away from each camera.
Two pictures were taken in two camera positions, one with a lens straight in front of the subject, one with the camera sideways (or upwards for the Zision). The object is positioned at 2 meter.
To test the cameras’ sensitivity to infrared light. We placed the same calibration object (the colorful basketball) at a distance of 2 meters, with the camera positioned between the subject and the light.
Xiaomi MADV (Mijia Sphere)
General Camera Details
Price $349 ($299 on sale)
Object Pixel Density + IR Sensitivity
The MadV has a resolution of 127*127 px when ball is in front of the camera and 133*133 px from side view. Its sensibility to infrared light is quite poor. With the target at a distance of 2 meter, it was not able to show anything.
with infrared light
Ricoh Theta V
Video Stitching Resolution
360 Stitched Video Format
Internal:3840 x 1920 at 29.97 fps (56 Mb/s MP4 via H.264) 1920 x 960 at 29.97 fps (16 Mb/s MP4 via H.264)
Still Image Resolution
JPEG: 14 Megapixel, 5376 x 2688 (2:1)
Number of Lenses
Camera per Lens
1-Chip 1/2.3″ CMOS
Optics per Lens
Minimum Focusing Distance
4.0″ / 10.2 cm
x Internal Flash Memory
1/25000 – 1/8 Second (Photo)1/25000 – 60 Seconds (Photo)1/25000 – 1/30 Second (Video)1/25000 – 1/30 Second (Streaming)
Photo ISO Range
100 – 1600 (Auto)64 – 3200 (Manual)
Video ISO Range
64 – 6400 (Auto)
The Ricoh Theta V showed a resolution of 100*100 px, no matter which position the camera was in.
Picture with infrared light.
Its sensibility to infrared light is the highest of all the cameras tested.
($379 on sale)
Samsung Gear 360 4K Spherical VR Camera
2 x 8.4 MP CMOS
2 x f/2.2 ultra-wide lenses
Max Video Resolution
360° Dual Lens: 4096 x 2048 at 24 fpsSingle Lens: 1920 x 1080 at 60 fps
Photo Capture Resolution
360° Dual Lens: Up to 15 MP (5472 x 2736)Single Lens: Up to 3 MP (2304 x 1296)
Up to 1600
Built-in stereo microphone
Up to 130 minutes in 2560 x 1280 resolution at 30 fps
1 x microSDXC card slot (supports up to 256 GB cards)
Supported Operating Systems
Android, iOS, Mac, Windows (360 Video Editor is not available for macOS computers)
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (2.4/5 GHz)
1 x USB 2.0 Type-C
with infrared light
The Samsung Gear has a resolution of 95*95 px when
positioned straight front of the ball, and 143*133 sideways. This camera shows
a high level of distortion at the latter position, and has a slightly lower
resolution compared to both Thetas.
proved somewhat sensible to infrared light, though noticeably less than that of
(though as of September 2019 price went up to $200)
Ricoh Theta S
Picture with infrared light
The Ricoh Theta S has, just as the Theta V, a resolution of 100*100 px for both sides. Its sensibility to infrared light was a bit less than that of the Theta V, but higher than that of the Samsung Gear.
Zision 360°Panoramic VR Full View
Picture with infrared light
Zision has a resolution of 166*166 px when positioned with its only lens facing
the subject directly, but the picture shows highly distorted when positioned
with the lens upwards.
sensibility to infrared light was poor, only a bit higher than that of the
Maginon View 360
50 euros (discount price)
Type of camera Full-spectrum camera for 360° spherical panoramas
Image sensor 2x 2MP CMOS sensor
Photo resolution 8 MP (4,000 x 2,000 | interpolated), 5 MB (3,200 x 1,600 | interpolated), 3 MP (2,592 x 1,296)
Video resolution 2.048 x 1.024 (30fps)
Lens 2x 210° super wide-angle lens
Aperture F = 2.0 | Focal length f: 0.88 mm
Recording time Up to 120 minutes with fully charged battery (without WiFi, 2048 x 1024 / 30fps)
Memory MicroSD card up to 32 GB (min. class 10 or faster)
Connections Micro USB connection
Power supply 1,300 mAh lithium-ion battery
Dimensions 137 x 45 x 14 mmWeight 83 g
with infrared light
Maginon has a resolution of 50*50, and showed
a bit of distortion when the camera is positioned sideways. Its sensibility to
infrared light was similar to that of the Zision.